This $600 AI Assistant Runs Your Life Through WhatsApp
One can work without sleep while you can rest, knowing all your bugs will get fixed overnight.
The time when AI was just a chatbot is over. But now it is wild to say that it doesn’t wait for your instructions, yet it is true.
Let’s have tea with OpenClaw (formerly Moltbot), an AI assistant that connects with you through WhatsApp. It gives you ideas, runs ahead to act without slowing down for instructions, and keeps you going all day.
What it does:
Fixes bugs in your code while you rest and gives you an insightful result
Sends you morning briefings with your schedule
Watches your servers and immediately alerts you when something breaks
You can use it for everything, from tracking to automation, just name it.
The creator called it “Claude with hands” or Clawdbot. It clicks, types, executes commands, and manages files when brought to life.
As the name suggests, the problem lies in its wild power. A recent report on 27th January 2026 accounts for a security research disclosure of 1,000+ online breaches on the web.
Who’s Accountable When AI-Generated Code Fails?
Now that coding is faster with AI, who shall be responsible for things when they break or do not work?
We all know the line when a code fails: “GPT wrote that section.” Although AI writes the code and works on it to get it merged, it doesn’t have a master.
The real problem isn’t bad AI code. It’s that teams never changed how they work after adding AI. It can work to save your time with new-age deployments, but are you ready for it?
Adding a member must redirect a change in the workflow of the entire team. Even if the member is AI, teamwork remains the same, and hence, we are stuck with this big problem of ownership.
The line between decisions made by humans and that of AI’s thrusting capability is still blurred. This is a conversation you need to have to boost your team’s confidence and efficiency.
The Data Problem That Breaks Every AI Project
Coping up with time when AI agents calculate and deliver before your instruction, the first question I ask here is simple: “Where is your data?”
You can’t build a reliable AI agent when your data lives in 12 different places. That’s like hiring a genius who can’t find any of your files.
Here’s what everyone skips, then wonders why their AI fails:
Why does your data foundation matter more than your AI model?
How to catch buying signals the moment they happen, not days later?
When should AI stop suggesting and actually start taking action?
Got A Prompt Certificate? Test Here
Stop Collecting Certifications. Start Building Systems.
Python and prompt engineering are the go-to meal for all now. LinkedIn is full of AI certifications and courses, yet you are missing something important to make a mark in 2026.
The real test isn’t what you learned in courses. It’s whether you can build AI systems with real-time deployment.
Test and build systems after you have answers to these:
Can you design workflows with segregation in AI tasks?
Can you integrate AI with real systems of CRM, database, etc.?
Can you lay out boundaries for agents to perform?
Engineers who understand this are not applying for jobs but creating roles that didn’t exist last year.
The skills that matter aren’t about prompts. They’re about making AI do real work while you sleep.
Swarnendu's Newsletter is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.





